Goncharov N. S. Elements of activity: places, movements, rhythms and resources

NIKOLAY S. GONCHAROV — Junior Researcher, Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia, Saint Petersburg) 
E-mail: gonni@kunstkamera.ru, nikola.gon4arov@yandex.ru


 Download  |  Go to Issue #4. 2019


УДК 394 
DOI 10.31250/2618-8619-2019-3(5)-220-231


ABSTRACT. The article discusses the methodological issues related to the study of the processes of production activities. The work is based on the field materials collected by the author in 2018 in the Zhigansk village, the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). The certain place is situated in the middle part of the Lena river, so it creates itsꞌ economical and socio-cultural peculiarities which can be expressed as “this is not big land yet, however, this is not still island”. The main research tool is the component analysis of the production activity considered through a combination of places, movements, materials / resources and rhythms. Applying this approach to ethnographic material, the author is confronted with specific properties of ethnographic objects and social morphology, which imply consideration of not isolated production processes, but sequences of combinations of activity elements are connected with each other. In the last part of the article the author concludes that using the approach we (as researchers) fixate – during the process of human (and non-human) activity — interesting fact of objects and reasons combinations which have totally different natures. This situation leads author to the necessity of changing current scholarsꞌ methods in order to find, describe and comprehend interweaves of different elements which lead humansꞌ activity exist.


KEYWORDS: production activities, elements, places, movements, materials, resources, rhythm



  • пМа 2018. поселок Жиганск, республика саха (якутия).
  • Анатомия человека / под ред. М. г. привеса, н. к. лысенкова, В. и. бушковича. спб., 2006.
  • Беннет Д. пульсирующая материя: политическая экология вещей. пермь, 2018.
  • Дуглас М. Чистота и опасность: анализ представлений об осквернении и табу. М., 2000.
  • Дюркгейм Э. социология и социальные науки // социология. ее предмет, метод, предназначе- ние. М., 1995. с. 275–276.
  • Латур Б. пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию. М., 2014.
  • Лефевр А. производство пространства. М., 2015.
  • Лич Э. культура и коммуникация: логика взаимосвязи символов. к использованию структурно- го анализа в социальной антропологии. М.: Восточная литература, 2001.
  • Мосс М. общества. обмен. личность. труды по социальной антропологии. М., 2014.
  • Ingold T. toward an ecology of Materials // annual review of anthropology. 2012. № 41. P. 427–442. Ingold T. in conversation with tim ingold // Journal of landscape architecture. 2014. № 92. P. 50–53. Lefebvre H. rhythmanalysis: space, time and everyday life. london, 2004.
  • Mauss M. seasonal Variations of the eskimo. a study in social Morphology. london; new york, 2004.
  • Olsen B. Material culture after text: remembering things // norwegian archaeological review. 2003. № 36. р. 87–104.
  • Olsen B. Keeping things at arm’s length: a genealogy of symmetry // World archaeology. 2007. № 39. р. 579–88.
  • Olsen B. in defense of things. Plymouth, uK: altamira, 2010.
  • Tarde G. on communication and social influence. selected Papers. chicago, 1969.
  • Webmoor T. What about «one more turn after the social» in archaeological reasoning: taking things seriously // World archaeology. 2007. № 39. р. 563–578.
  • Witmore C. symmetrical archaeology: excerpts from a manifesto // World archaeology. 2007. № 39. р. 546–562.