Kosogorova M. A. Ideophones and intensifiers in Pular

Maria A. Kosogorova
Moscow State University;
Institute of Linguistics RAS
Moscow, Russia
E-mail: maria.kosogorova@gmail.com


  Download  |  Go to Issue #4. 2019


УДК 811.4 
DOI 10.31250/2618-8619-2019-4(6)-131-140


ABSTRACT. The article discusses two word classes in Pular, one of the major languages of Guinea. The first part of the article deals with ideophones, which is a common word class in African languages. In Pular it has a number of characteristic features, revealed in the research. Firstly, Pular ideophones are not solely of the onomatopoeic origin, but can also be of the sensory imagery origin, as it is called by some researchers, which is based on other senses than hearing. The sensory imagery theory is widely discussed in the context of other languages, but in Pular it seems to be very adequate. Secondly, Pular ideophones are mostly grammaticalized, thus becoming other parts of speech. Some of them are, for instance, fully functional predicates and attributes. The second part of the article deals with intensifiers, which is a well-described word class in Pular, mainly because it contains a strictly limited number of widespread lexemes. Its main feature is the strict concordance of each intensifier with only one main lexeme to which it can be attached. The third part of the article presents a comparison of these two word classes and their features, deciding whether they can act as a single word class or not.


KEYWORDS: Pular, ideophones, intensifiers, discourse, grammaticalization



  • Зубко Г. В. Фула-русско-французский словарь. М., 1980.
  • Лютикова Е. А. Когнитивная типология: рефлексивы и интенсификаторы. М., 2002.
  • Athanasiadou A. On the Subjectivity of Intensifiers // Language Sciences. 2007. № 29. P. 554–565.
  • Barrie E. Teaching grammar of Pular. Christian Reformed World Missions, 1996.
  • Bettison Jim & Karen. Dictionnaire Pular-Français. 2 éd. Labé, 2006.
  • Bodomo A. The Structure of Ideophones in African and Asian Languages: the Case of Dagaare and Cantonese // Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics / ed. J. Mugane et al. Sommerville. MA, 2006. P. 203–213.
  • Chafe W. L. Linguistic Differences Produced by Differences between Speech and Writing // Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing / eds. D. R. Olson, N. Torrace, A. Hildyard. Cambrige, 1985. P. 105–123.
  • Diallo A. Grammaire Descriptive du pular du Fuuta Jaloo (Guinée). Frankfurt am Main, 2000. (Schriften zur Afrikanistik, 3).
  • Dingemanse M. Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones // Language and Linguistics Compass . 2012. Vol. 6 (10). P. 654–672.
  • Dingemanse M. Ideophones and Gesture in Everyday Speech // Gesture. 2013. Vol. 13 (2). P. 143–165.
  • Dingemanse M. Ideophones and Reduplication // Studies in Language. 2015. Vol. 39 (4). P. 946–970.
  • Dingemanse M. Redrawing the Margins of Language: Lessons from Research on Ideophones // Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. 2018. Vol. 3 (1). P. 1–30.
  • Doke C. M. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. New York, 1935.
  • Ibarretxe-Antuñano I. Basque Ideophones from a Typological Perspective // Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Vol. 62 (2). P. 1–25.
  • König E. & Gast V. Focused Assertion of Identity: A Typology of Intensifiers // Linguistic Typology. 2006. № 10. P. 223–276.
  • Labov W. Intensity // Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications / ed. D. Shiffirn. Washington DC, 1984. P. 43–70.
  • Moravcsik E. Some Cross-linguistic Generalizations about Intensifier Constructions // Chicago Linguistic Society. 1972. № 8. P. 271–277.
  • Peck H .T. Onomatopoeia in Some West African Languages // The American Journal of Phonology. 1886. Vol. 7 (4). P. 489–495.
  • Samarin W. J. Perspective on African Ideophones // African Studies. 1965. Vol. 24 (2). P. 117–121.
  • Samarin W. J. Field Procedures in Ideophone Research // Journal of African Languages. 1970. № 12. P. 130–168.
  • Van Dijk T. A. Relevance Assignment in Discourse Comprehension // Discourse Processes. 1979. № 2. P. 113–127.
  • Westermann D. H. Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sprachen // Festschrift Meinhof / ed. F. Boas. Hamburg, 1927. P. 315–328.
  • Zellemayer M. Intensifiers in Hebrew and English // Journal of Pragmatics. 1991. № 15. P. 43–58.
  • Zoubko G. Dictionnaire peul-français. Osaka, 1996.